Proposition 137 Arizona 2025 Proposal

Proposition 137 Arizona 2025 Proposal. Students and faculty weigh in on proposition to change term limits for AZ justices The Arizona Voting 'no' on the proposition would oppose challenging initiatives up to 100 days before the election, keeping the current practice of only being able to challenge after the referendum is filed with the secretary of state, according to Article 5, Title 19 of the Arizona Revised Statues A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to:

By contrast, Proposition 137 is a legislature-referred proposal that would eliminate the power held by voters for fifty years to assess and hold the judiciary accountable. Proposition 137 was a proposal to eliminate term limits for judges

Arizona Proposition 137 cuts voters out of how judges are retained Phoenix New Times

By contrast, Proposition 137 is a legislature-referred proposal that would eliminate the power held by voters for fifty years to assess and hold the judiciary accountable. Voting 'no' on the proposition would oppose challenging initiatives up to 100 days before the election, keeping the current practice of only being able to challenge after the referendum is filed with the secretary of state, according to Article 5, Title 19 of the Arizona Revised Statues This model, now known as Arizona's judicial retention system, was established by voters in 1974 through Proposition 107, a voter-led ballot initiative

Arizona Proposition 137 cuts voters out of how judges are retained Phoenix New Times. A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to: Arizona voters will decide whether state judges should be awarded lifetime appointments, after the Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday cleared a proposal to do just that for the November ballot

Arizona Proposition 137 What to know about voting on judges. 5, 2024, election would eliminate automatic judicial retention elections Proposition 137 was referred to the ballot by the Legislature.